@Article{SantosSibBücGonFer:2014:ThMHSi,
author = "Santos, J. C. and Sibeck, D. G. and B{\"u}chner, J. and Gonzalez,
Walter Dem{\'e}trio and Ferreira, J. L.",
affiliation = "{Universidade de Bras{\'{\i}}lia (UNB)} and NASA and {Max Planck
Institut f{\"u}r Sonnensystemforschung} and {Instituto Nacional
de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Universidade de
Bras{\'{\i}}lia (UNB)}",
title = "Three-dimensional MHD simulation of FTEs produced by merging at an
isolated point in a sheared magnetic field configuration",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics",
year = "2014",
volume = "119",
number = "3",
pages = "2009--2023",
abstract = "We present predictions for the evolution of FTEs generated by
localized bursts of reconnection on a planar magnetopause that
separates a magnetosheath region of high densities and weak
magnetic field from a magnetospheric region of low densities and
strong magnetic field. The magnetic fields present a shear angle
of 105 degrees. Reconnection forms a pair of FTEs each crossing
the magnetopause in the field reversal region and bulging into the
magnetosphere and magnetosheath. At their initial stage they can
be characterized as flux tubes since the newly reconnected
magnetic field lines are not twisted. Reconnection launches
Alfvenic perturbations that propagate along the FTEs generating
high-speed jets, which move the pair of FTEs in opposite
directions. As the FTE moves, it displaces the ambient magnetic
field and plasma producing bipolar magnetic field and plasma
velocity signatures normal to the nominal magnetopause in the
regions surrounding the FTE. The combination of the ambient plasma
with the FTE flows generates a vortical velocity pattern around
the reconnected field lines. During its evolution the FTE evolves
to a flux rope configuration due to the twist of the magnetic
field lines. The alfvenic perturbations propagate faster along the
part of the FTE bulging into the magnetosphere than in the
magnetosheath, and due to the differences between the plasma and
magnetic field properties the perturbations have slightly
different signatures in the two regions. As a consequence, the
FTEs have different signatures depending on whether the satellite
encounters the part bulging into the magnetosphere or into the
magnetosheath. Key Points Vortical flow associated to FTEs Single
FTE signatures 3D non-antiparallel magnetic fields ©2013. American
Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.",
doi = "10.1002/2013JA018964",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013JA018964",
issn = "2169-9402",
label = "scopus 2014-05 SantosSibB{\"u}cGonFer:2014:ThMHSi",
language = "en",
urlaccessdate = "27 abr. 2024"
}